Can we help you find something?

Content type
Categories
Country
Organization Type

Comments

Daniel,

 

My views on the same are as follows.

 

I don’t expect the ongoing talks between Bаrrick and the government of Tanzania could conclude endorsement or rejection of the results generated from а presidential re-sampling of some of the containers of mineral concentrates dwelt on.

 

Meaning, the only way the talks could yield an amicable settlement which is а win-win for both sides is to conclude that the re-sampling of some of the containers of mineral concentrates carried out by а presidential team should be repeated by an independent/ а joint team which would generate legally binding re-sampling results which would be honoured by both sides as а valid basis of the talks.

 

And that, it is only the talks between Bаrrick/ АCАCIА and the government of Tanzania could yield а solution to the dispute which is а win-win for both sides.  

 

An international court of arbitration is definitely going to conclude that the results generated from а presidential re-sampling of some of the containers of mineral concentrates dwelt on are misleading, the ban of АCАCIА’s mineral concentrates exporting unfounded, hence favour АCАCIА which would be compensated by the government of Tanzania for the damages its ban of mineral concentrates exporting and misleading results of its presidential re-sampling of the mineral concentrates dwelt on would caused it.